|
|
|
The Community Research Connections dynamic website is a project of the Canada Research Chair and was released in October 2006. It hosts a public forum and a series of community case studies.
Cases demonstrate explicit (and implicit) links among and between the 3 substantive “pillars” of the research project:
- Networks
- Social Capital
- Sustainable Development
Following methodological precedents in the social sciences, (see e.g. Stake, 1996), each case may be contextually and functionally unique (as opposed to shared across sectors). Indeed, there is a strong methodological argument to be made for the study of each case as a distinct learning opportunity, one that is important precisely because of its uniqueness. Yet all cases will be focused around the organising principle of networks, in differing contexts and for varying purposes/outcomes. That each case be composed of identifiable networks is key: networks are the common underlying characteristic. Cases should be selected according to key issues or qualities having to do with the formation and organisation of each respective network. For example, how was the network formed? According to which crises or opportunities? Was the network formed proactively, for policy, e.g. or in response to a crisis? Notwithstanding the unique context and substantive “content” of each case as a learning (through research) opportunity, networks and their concomitant cases should share several other key criteria, or at least be able to be situated (and “mapped”) along an identifiable continuum for each criterion. These criteria reflect the larger scope of the research project and its links to social capital and SD. These shared criteria and their continua are:
- Leadership: presence of identifiable leadership (from single to collaborative)
- Enthusiasm: participant enthusiasm and motivation, degree of engagement (e.g. from apathy to highly driven)
- Scale: clarity of a single issue or multiple related issues
- Evolution: traceable organisational evolution, from pre-network to multi-scale network of networks. Evolution in any case should move beyond the bonding level and show org. evolution of goals, mandate, leadership etc. to be valid for study.
- Intervention: identifiable timing and degree of government intervention
- Diversity: 1. degree of observable or identifiable diversity of leaders and engaged participants, from visible minorities, gender balance etc. Power balance in network decision-making was not discussed but remains and open question. 2. Diversity of case types, e.g. government and non-government.
- Outcome: continuity of the network, from planned obsolescence to self-perpetuation
- Evaluation: observable (explicit or implicit) attempts to evaluate successes and/or failures, measures for self-evaluation or by an external agency (rare)
- Feasibility/Pragmatism: cases must be accessible, feasible and “researchable” from a functional perspective. Distance, cost, background data accessibility, and openness of key leaders/participants are all factors to be considered for this criterion.
|

|
Canadian municipalities are in the unique position of being at the forefront for realizing sustainable development in communities across Canada. To assist communities, particularly smaller and medium-sized ones, to develop their own INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY PLAN we have developed a plan template describing what should be in such a plan as well as an active community engagement strategy designed to ensure implementation. Embedded in the plan template are additional research and practitioner links for your reference.
|

|
This Community Liveability Survey / Sondage sur la vie en collectivité is uniquely designed for Canadians to compare and contrast your community's socialability, sustainability and your capacity to make changes towards more sustainable community development. It will only take a few minutes of your time, make a difference now.
Five randomly chosen respondents will be selected at the end of the survey period to win an Apple iPod shuffle®. Your response is CONFIDENTIAL. You will only be asked to identify yourself if you wish to register to win the Apple iPod shuffle® and you will not be contacted by anyone unless you win.
Parmi les participants, cinq (5) personnes seront choisies au hasard et recevront un iPod shuffleMD de marque Apple. Vos réponses sont CONFIDENTIELLES. Vous devrez toutefois vous identifier si vous désirez participer au tirage du iPod shuffleMD de marque Apple. Vous serez contacté seulement si vous gagnez.
|
|
 |
|
| |
|